Pearce's argument raises vital questions. It also splits the environmental movement wide open:
It is important to know what
agribusiness can and cannot deliver. But it is equally important to be angered
by the appalling injustice of people having their ancestral land pulled from
beneath their feet. And to question the arrogance and ignorance surrounding
claims, by home governments and Western investors alike, that huge areas of
Africa are "empty" lands only awaiting the magic of foreign hands and
foreign capital. And to balk at the patina of virtue that often surrounds
environmentalists eagerly taking other people's land in the interests of
protecting wildlife. What right do "green grabbers" have to take
peasant fields and pastures to grow biofuels, cordon off rich pastures for
nature conservation, shut up forests as carbon stores, and fence in wilderness
as playpens and hunting grounds for rich sponsors? They are cooking up a
"tragedy of the commons" in reverse.
Over the next few decades I
believe land grabbing will matter more, to more of the planet's people, even
than climate change. The new land rush looks increasingly like a final enclosure
of the planet's wild places, a last roundup on the global commons. Is this the
inevitable cost of feeding the world and protecting its surviving wildlife?
Must the world's billion or so peasants and pastoralists give up their
hinterlands in order to nourish the rest of us? Or is this a new colonialism
that should be confronted--the moment when localism and communalism fight back? (ix-x)
Fred Pearce, The Land Grabbers: The New Fight over Who Owns Earth (Beacon Press, 2012)
No comments:
Post a Comment