Coal has played a huge role in China's development;
 Richard Heinberg says "it may not be an oversimplification to say  that the fate of China’s economy rests on its ability to maintain growth  in coal supplies." Heinberg also explores the problems of China's investment led export boom and vulnerabilities it has from an aging population, but it is the physical restraint he begins with and which he evidently thinks is primary. 
China relies on coal for 80 percent of its electricity and 70  percent of its total energy; coal also supports China’s steel industry,  the world’s largest. Altogether, China is one of the most coal-dependent  nations in the world. In order to become the world’s second-largest  economy, it has had to more than double its coal consumption over the  past decade, so that it is now using nearly half of all coal consumed  globally, and over three times as much as is consumed in the next nation  in line, the U.S. (which prides itself on being “the Saudi Arabia of  coal”). . . . 
The nation has recently updated its proven coal reserves to 187  billion metric tons, putting it second in line after the U.S. in terms  of supplies. That would be about 62 years’ worth of coal at 2009 rates  of consumption (over three billion tons per year). But this simple  “lifetime” calculation is highly misleading. 
Reserves lifetime figures are calculated on the basis of flat  demand and lose meaning if demand grows over time. China’s coal  consumption is accelerating rapidly, so that the expected “62 years’  worth” must be adjusted downward. Demand forecasts from China’s Energy  Research Institute would reduce the reserves lifetime to about 33 years;  but if coal demand were to grow in step with projected Chinese economic growth, the reserves lifetime would drop to just 19 years. 
Yet this still doesn’t capture the situation. Production will peak  and decline long before China’s coal completely runs out. Further, as  with oil production, coal mining proceeds on the basis of the  “best-first” or “low-hanging fruit” principle, so we must assume that  China is extracting its highest-quality, easiest-accessed coal now,  leaving the lower-quality and more expensively mined coal for later.  Unlike the U.S., China does not have vast deposits of surface-minable  coal; over 90 percent of China’s coal comes from underground mines up to 1,000 meters in depth, and those mines face increasing engineering challenges.. . . 
China has few options for reducing its reliance on coal, since the  fuel is used in so many ways. In addition to powering the electricity  and steel sectors, coal provides winter heat to hundreds of millions of  northern Chinese; it is also used in the cement, non-ferrous metals, and  chemicals industries. While China is rapidly expanding its supply of  natural gas,to replace just the coal used for heating would double total  gas consumption. 
China is quickly developing alternative energy sources. But can  these be brought on line fast enough to make a difference? Let’s do some  numbers. China aims to have 100 gigawatts (GW) of wind power capacity  by 2020, and the nation’s leaders plan to expand installed solar  capacity to 20 GW during the same period. These are truly astonishing  goals, and, if China even comes close to accomplishing them, it will  become the world’s renewable energy leader. But there is a problem.  Total Chinese electricity generation capacity is 900 GW currently; with  seven percent growth, that means the nation’s electricity demand in 2020  will be something like 1800 GW. Wind and solar together would supply  less than seven percent of that. The only thing likely to boost that  percentage much would be a dramatic reduction in growth of energy demand  to, say, two percent annually. 
The situation with nuclear power is similar: China has 11 atomic  power plants now and is in the process of building 20 more, with a  target of 60 GW of generating capacity, or possibly more, by 2020. But  this will supply only between three and five percent of total  electricity demand, depending on energy demand growth rates. In late  2010, energy policy makers in Beijing evidently began to take notice of  the looming electricity supply problem, and rumors circulated of new  efforts to construct up to 245 new nuclear plants over the next two  decades (the U.S. has only 104 in total). If this new target is real,  and if the Chinese succeed in achieving it, a large fraction of new  electricity demand for the coming years could be met through sources  other than coal—but China would still have an enormous (though more  slowly growing) coal dependence to feed. Meanwhile, China’s soaring  demand for uranium would push up global prices for this energy  mineral. 
 
In 2009 China was a substantial net importer of coal, having been a  net exporter every year through 2008.[7] China could import more coal  to enable further growth, but the biggest exporters of coal—Australia,  Indonesia, and South Africa—have much smaller reserves and production  rates. The entire seaborne trade in steam coal (mainly used by power  plants) currently amounts to only 630 million tons per year, and China  could absorb this much with only three years of continued growth in coal  demand. That’s not going to happen, though: Other nations need that  export coal, too—including India, also a major coal-based economy, and  also a country needing to import increasing amounts of fuel. 
The conclusion is unsettling but inescapable: China’s reliance on  coal cannot be significantly reduced as long as its demand for  electrical power continues to grow at anything like current rates. And  even if energy demand growth tapers off and alternative energy sources  come on line quickly, the country’s ability to supply enough coal  domestically will still be challenged. This will drive up coal prices  worldwide, while choking off economic growth at home. China’s energy  economy is unsustainable and will cease growing in the foreseeable  future, impacting many other nations as it does so. 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment